Content deleted Content added
→Delreview: re |
→Delreview: WP:DELREV would be more appropriate |
||
Line 430:
:::Yes, that would be a typical argument for why these types of pages should be kept. Looking at the histories of the deleted pages, you could probably make a decent argument on those lines for restoring [[Wikipedia talk:Assyrian-Syriac Wikipedia cooperation board]]. It's the only one of the deleted pages that has a substantial contribution history. --[[User:RL0919|RL0919]] ([[User talk:RL0919#top|talk]]) 21:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
::::That being the case without the principle page, the talk page is liable to be deleted per [[WP:G8]]. Either way, as closing admin would you consider restoring? –<span style="font-family:CG Times">[[User:MJL|<span style="color:black">MJL</span>]] [[User talk:MJL|‐'''Talk'''‐]]<sup>[[WP:WikiProject Connecticut|☖]]</sup></span> 03:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
:::::I don't think unilateral restoration would be appropriate. You are making a different argument now than you did then, but I don't know what the responses would be from others; they could have new counterarguments as well. So the appropriate thing is to let others weigh in at a [[WP:Deletion review]] discussion. If just the talk page is restored, there are ways the G8 problem could be dealt with (for example, recreate the associated page as a note explaining what was done), so I don't believe that should be a significant barrier. --[[User:RL0919|RL0919]] ([[User talk:RL0919#top|talk]]) 17:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||